just what i was thinking as i looked at em, they both look suspiciously similar to NS frames

absolutely.
a well butted tube does not need to be thicker than 5mm at least.
just adding material till it doesnt break anymore is a litte bit too 2k1

The forks are long so that you can run a 29" front wheel

http://www.agent-bikes.de/seite15.html
that there is he bike he is talking about and it does look almost identical except where the seat tube meets the upper frame tube. even look at the flat section on both bikes right by the bottom bracket.

why are pep ging Another language negative props ?

concur!

well, if your are new on street/dirt market, how could you designt a good frame for street, because workloads in sreet/dirt are different than in trials? (geometry too) though the time will show how much these frames will last for.
Secondly, i dont think that copying is bad, many frames have some pros and cons, wisely taking good things and changing bad ones it's possible to design a really good, but not unique frame. Who cares if technology is the same as on the other frames, unique is not the thing that helps to ride better.
Talking about the B2D frames i'm a bit confused about rear dropouts. as i understood they are 110x14 = BMX hub compatible, though they have disc mounts?? are there any bmx hubs with dosc mounts?
This frame also has ability to fit all the bmx parts, wearing 480mm fork BB is 0, that means if u use 24" and some lower fork 425mm or so, your BB will be very low and pedlas will touch the ground while driving to the side.
Have you any pics of a complete bike with this frame?

Well basically, if you're going to steal something do it right, the V-Brake system you've chosen is a good one, but put it on the other side of the seatstay (BMX Style) so it's not that noticable (people that won't use the V-Brake mounts will like this). Further more the seattubes on your frames are a bit too long for nowadays standards, I would suggest you cut these down about 1cm. The dropout system on the second frame, though effective are alot of work when you want to remove your rear wheel in the case of a flat tire. The derailleur hangers are pretty unneccesary because these frames are aimed at Dirt/Street riders, and they hardly ever use gears. The fork is way too high, most people ride with a fork around 80mm or 100mm at max, and most people don't want to have to buy a specific fork just so they can use this frame. The good things are; the intergrated headset + spanish BB on the first frame. You should do this to the second one too. The good thing is the geometry, the only flaw in the geometry is the fact that it's adapted for such a high fork...if it were compatible with either a 425mm rigid fork or a 80mm suspension fork, I would consider buying the first frame.

ya and how about keeping it like a mountain bike. if it uses all these bmx parts why not just get a bmx bike?

i think that the most important things are already said.
but if like, could you please explain your intention behind the brands name?
as far as im informed, the "haunebu" is a myth of the 3rd reich?
please dont tell me "that this was a really cool idear, youve heard of".
so?

well, there's no way you've never heard about such brands as for example NS, if you're from this country. but even if you haven't- how would you design almost identical in certain details frame then? dunno much about angles, but I can't accept what you've said anyway. however it doesn't mean I wish you bad, keep this bussines expanding, but I recommend adding some indivituality to this products line

is there any chance of these making there way to australia